Conceptual Of Targhib In Social Exchange Theory

Authors

  • Rita Andini Sultan Agung Islamic University
  • Dwi Retna Sulistyawati Sultan Agung Islamic University
  • Tri Handayani Sultan Agung Islamic University
  • Heri Poerbantoro Sultan Agung Islamic University
  • Sukamto Sukamto Sultan Agung Islamic University

Keywords:

Targhib, Social Exchange Theory, Organizational Performance, Social Interaction

Abstract

This study tries to explore the overall concept of targhib, namely that there are four factors that are used in shaping the performance of an Islamic organization (ta'awun/help, as-samahah/tolerance, friendship, ukhuwah, tawadhu') as a rule in conducting interactions both individually and collectively. group. In the concept of targhib, it functions to motivate humans as individuals and groups in small and large organizations, as was done by the Prophet Muhammad at the beginning of preaching activities. Rasulullah SAW encouraged us humans with the promise of reward and Jannah, for anyone who is able to walk according to the creed of monotheism and far from polytheism by carrying out the values ​​of ta'awun / help, as-samahah / tolerance, friendship, ukhuwah, tawadhu' in organizing. Tafsir Ibnu Katsir, (2013) explains targhib is a certainty of comfort, pleasure in the hereafter which is done with seduction. This concept refers to human nature, which has the desire to always live in a state of pleasure, safety and away from difficult or suffering conditions.

References

Albarracin, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (1967). The handbook of attitudes. In Gastronomía ecuatoriana y turismo local (Vol. 1, Issue 69).

Almuqrin, H. A. (2022). Social exchange theory and theory of reasoned action affecting knowledge sharing: A case from Saudi Arabia. Journal of Information Studies & Technology (JIS&T), 2022(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5339/jist.2022.5

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Dao, B. T. T., & Ta, T. D. N. (2020). A meta-analysis: Capital structure and firm performance. Journal of Economics and Development, 22(1), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/jed-12-2019-0072

Dichter, E. (2015). Book review of the month: Dichter’s dream book handbook of consumer motivations: The psychology of the world of.

Georgopoulos, B. S., & Tannenbaum, A. S. (1957). A study of organizational effectiveness. American Sociological Review, 22(5), 534. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089477

Grant, R. M. (1996). Firm. 17, 109–122.

Homans, G. C. (1961). The humanities and the social sciences. American Behavioral Scientist, 4(8), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276426100400802

Isa, M., & Jalil, A. (2020). Giving in an Islamic perspective. November.

Obermayer, N., & Toth, V. E. (2020). Organizational dynamics: Exploring the factors affecting knowledge sharing behavior. Kybernetes, 49(1), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-04-2019-0300

Porter, M. E. (1986). Changing patterns of international relations. California Management Review, 25(1), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298730020010301

Price, M. (1968). History in danger. History, 53(179), 342–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-229X.1968.tb01227.x

Rubera, G., & Kirca, A. H. (2012). Firm innovativeness and its performance outcomes: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Marketing, 76(3), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.10.0494

Schaap, D. (2021). Police trust-building strategies: A socio-institutional, comparative approach. Policing and Society, 31(3), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2020.1726345

Taouab, O., & Issor, Z. (2019). Firm performance: Definition and measurement models. European Scientific Journal ESJ, 15(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2019.v15n1p93

Yeşil, S., & Dereli, S. F. (2013). An empirical investigation of the organisational justice, knowledge sharing and innovation capability. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75, 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.023

Yi, W., Li, C., & Wei, L. (2017). Empowering group leaders encourages knowledge sharing: Integrating the social exchange theory and positive organizational behavior perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management.

Zhang, Y., Sun, J. M., Lin, C. H., & Ren, H. (2020). Linking core self-evaluation to creativity: The roles of knowledge sharing and work meaningfulness. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35(2), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9609-y

Zhou, M., Cai, X., Liu, Q., & Fan, W. (2019). Examining continuance use on social network and micro-blogging sites: Different roles of self-image and peer influence. International Journal of Information Management, 47, 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.010

Downloads

Published

2024-06-12

How to Cite

Rita Andini, Dwi Retna Sulistyawati, Tri Handayani, Heri Poerbantoro, & Sukamto Sukamto. (2024). Conceptual Of Targhib In Social Exchange Theory. International Journal Business, Management and Innovation Review, 1(4), 01–09. Retrieved from https://ekonomi-univetbantara.id/index.php/ijbmir/article/view/29

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): November : International Journal Business, Management and Innovation Review

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal Business, Management and Innovation Review

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.